|
|
 |
|
|
 |

 |
| Shore's
Research, Commentary and Consulting Receives Prestigious
Recognition.
[more...] |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
 |
|
|
|
 |
 |
 |
|
|
Raw Footage: Google Video Surfaces a
World of Rich Media from Pros and Users |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
24 January 2006 |
|
|
|
|
While there's quite a bit of excitement about Google's new
video search and ecommerce service it's also taken
considerable flak being generated by those claiming to be
in the know about what video on the Web should be. Many of
these suggestions call for slickness and more features, but
the basics of what make content work on the Web don't
necessarily call for the most flashy and gimmicky
solutions. It's more important to think about where video
content is put to use by users and portals that put it to
the most use by its audiences. That may mean more than
premium video benefiting from online exposure but that's
the playing field that premium providers must adjust to
sooner rather than later. |
|
One of the more annoying
aspects of the so-called "Web 2.0" movement is the
preponderance of self-proclaimed experts on the topic who crow
about the power of user-generated media but who become rather
despondent about anyone's efforts to surface its value but
their own. The hissing and dissing surrounding
Google's new
Video portal seems to be one of the more noisy examples of
this as of late. An impatient
David Pogue at The New York Times peppered Google with
suggestions as to what they should be doing with this
first-ever confluence of pay-per-view and free video search
online while
the Chicago Tribune and numerous Silicon Valley weblogs
gave less than sterling reviews. Google's losing its touch,
this cranky wisdom goes, throwing up a crude and thin product
while others come out with far more polished products -
eventually. How could something so basic have any real appeal?
Online video content is coming into its own in an era in
which the once-rudimentary Web has gained a strong sense of its own
sophistication, with the burgeoning investments of traditional
media producers creating high expectations for the quick
development of mature online markets for video. But at its heart the Web is
still very much an experiment, a global pastiche of clever
ideas held together loosely by a handful of useful technical
standards and a fair amount of goodwill. Google Video is an
experiment that harkens back to the Web's very early days, when there
was far more interest in content than lots of great places to
find it - and therefore a lot of shoulder-rubbing amongst
unlikely peers via search engines and other interfaces. It's a
paradigm that we're still living with today for much of the
premium content that's out there online, highlighted more
strongly for video because of the limited range of video
content currently in play.
The "right" way to do video online is far from a given, but
it's likely to resemble Google Video more than many would like
to think. The inherent appeal of the Web is that it combines
raw, cooked and unexpectedly brilliant sources in contexts that
make it harder for premium content to look appealing just
because it's premium. In spite of production values and other
inherent strengths the power of professional video therefore
must be rethought in much the same way that other mainstream
media sources have had to be rethought in light of the online
explosion of media from individual and institutional sources.
A video still for a blockbuster film next to stills from
amateur sources in Web search results faces the same branding
and value issues that any other premium source faces in
text-oriented search results.
Where does premium video go from here? There will be iPod-like
"walled gardens" of video content available via many channels,
to be sure, and digital rights management will make it easier
for these convenient outlets to sustain themselves from the
beginning. But the crucial issue for video is to adapt to a
world of peers in Content Nation who are increasingly glad
to get video from amateur producers and distributors as much as
from major media outlets. Here are a few thoughts as to how
video producers catering to both consumer and business markets
should position themselves in an online world still driven
largely by Google searchers:
- They'll come if you build it, but that's not the whole
solution. The Web is of course a far more sophisticated
place than when text content first made its way online, yet
many new efforts to promote online video seem to be stuck still in that
earlier era's "build it and they will come" metaphor
as video store outlets begin to surface in many quarters. But
video needs to get integrated with a broader array of content
types early on and to get so that it doesn't come as an
afterthought for people looking for a wide range of content
to address a need. Thinking very broadly about competition
and channels will be essential to this year's successful
video strategies.
- Focus on self-syndication for distribution. One of
the reasons that Google Video is taking it on the chin from
so many angles is that outlets such as
Blinkx have
come out strongly with easy ways for users to browse and
search for video content and then to subscribe to specific
topics via an RSS feed to their own PCs and mobile units.
While many of the Blinkx tools are still pretty balky, the
concept of allowing users to build their own syndications of
video content is going to be the key to video distribution
for many audiences. This concept is going to be largely an
afterthought for most video producers right now, but being
able to help users define their own sets of video content for
syndication will be one of the emerging keys to effective
video distribution.
- Get users involved in value-add early on. While
early video distribution efforts such as the famous
Star
Wars Kid track proved the appeal of user-generated video,
they also proved through the dozens of remixes of the video
the importance of giving users access to video content to add
value. With the push towards DRM professional video producers
are risking locking out the ability for users to annotate and
use fair-use snippets to popularize a particular video
product. Why spend millions on trailers and traditional
distribution when your users can create both word of mouth
and highly targeted marketing for you?
Google Video is a modest early entry for the growing online
video services marketplace. But it's a stable and growing
experiment that promises to encourage users to look at video
not just as an interesting novelty but as a universal resource
as important as any other kind of online content. It may be too
raw for some pundits' taste but it's the rawness that offers
the exciting possibility that it and other similar services are
still open to being shaped in new and exciting directions. But
most importantly any search solution alone is going to be just
the beginning of video footage's voyage on an increasingly
user-defined Web. Google video may be just the thing to get
that voyage started in a much bigger way than ever before.
-
John Blossom
To top of
page
 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|